Was king henry an innovator?

total heat the VII was born on the 28th of January 1457 and had a truly interesting life. He became king In the well-known Battle of Bowwows where he killed the king at that time, who was Richard Ill with the assistance of the Stanley brothers. At that point In history, England was a very lightheaded culturally, economically and militarily. England was also torn in half for years by a civil state of war which is also known as the Wars of the Roses. This meant that king atomic number 1 VII had not only inherited the roof but several major robbers, which atomic number 1 int cease to solve these issues.Some of these problems were that the British Isles needed unification, as two Ireland and Scotland were both hostile and separate, or the English Just didnt have control over them. Another problem was the military development. The army Henry inherited with his crown relied on the bow, while other nations were moving on to fire arms. Above all else, though, King Henry VII planned to create a raw dynasty the Tudor dynasty. He went ab prohibited solving these Issues In a very clever and unique title which proved to be sound.Some believed, though, that Henry merely adopted these ideas from previous monarchs and It just proved more effective In his rule. Thats why at that place Is not an agreement on whether or not King Henry was an Innovator. Some historians argue that King Henry the VII was an innovator, and have many arguments to support them. Most, if not all, of these arguments turn around three main areas which were finance, foreign policies and his descent with the nobles. On the first area, Henry held money very close to his heart. He had adoptedEdward Avis use of the chamber (which bottom also show that he wasnt an innovator) but had ended up creating more than 3 times the revenue that Edward had made, which was due partly to the item that Henry manage his accounts more closely than Edward. Henry also TLD spoil his family. He was assisted greatl y by the fact that the only relative In his family was his uncle who had passed away a decade after his reign. Further proof can be seen by He was careful not to give away much to his wifes relatives, the Woodpile connection, to whom Edward had been more disinterested.Henry also developed to a fine are his recognizes, which were basically a way of ensuring that henrys more burning(prenominal) subjects obeyed the law and lived in peace. The way these recognizes worked were that if a nobleman or gentleman offended the king, or that their take in was a threat to the public order, they would be obliged to pay specified sums of money if they broke the conditions pose down by the recognizes. It is shown that out of the 62 peers that existed between years 1485 and 1 509, 46 of them were under recognizes at one point or another.This as henrys method of holding the upper class to ransom for their profound behavior. At the start of Henrys reign, he had inherited a considerable debt, but ended up decorous solvent In the beginning of his reign. Henry not only became solvent but ended up securing a surplus In his later years. He also had a very strong relationship with the nobles. During The Wars of the Roses, many nobles had taken advantage of relationship to the nobility than his predecessor did.Henry, unlike Edward who made nine red-hot earls, only made two new earls who were his stepfather Lord Stanley and Edward Courtesan. Another difference between Henry and Edward were that there were no super-nobles, while in Edwards reign he had made his mothers brother more powerful by showering him with land. Henry was very cautious not to reward too generously, even to the nobles who were most useful to him. Retaining, which was that lords could wait servants or followers to serve him in war or peace, was a major problem for Henry.Both Henry and his predecessor knew that they shouldnt end it all together, as they recognized a nobles right to entourage, due to the fact that these ties of inscription between lords and their followers were important for the smooth functioning of society. Henrys aim, though, was to attempt to end the lawlessness and corruption which could sequel if retaining remained unchecked. That is when he created the rule in 1504, which stated that every lord had to obtain a license for his retinue from the king equipped with a list of named retainers. The main difference between Henry and Edward was that Henry implement his laws in a more resolute way.Foreign policies were another one of his specialties. Both Edward and his successor .NET about alike taking claim to the French throne, both led invasions of France and both achieved treaties by which the French king agree to pay them annually. They were also very similar with Scotland, as both of them concluded long truces with their neighbors which were eventually wiped out(p) up by open war. Differences between the two kings were even clearer. King Edward was the renaissanc e prince, and sought out to gain land by attempting to invade France and Scotland, which were both serious attempts to gain some of the land that England had lost.Henry on the other hand was quite the opposite. He was more inclined to peace than war. Henry had subscribe a treaty with Spain to ensure security. The treaty of friendship opened the way to marriage between Catherine of Argon, the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella, and Henrys eldest son, Prince Arthur. He had also strengthened his connections with Scotland by marrying his daughter Margaret and James IV of Scotland, and also ensured that Henry VIII should marry Catherine of Argon, after the death of Prince Arthur.